SDF · Applied Scenario

Large filling vs crownWhen reinforcement becomes structurally necessary.

Not all large fillings need crowns. But not all large fillings are safe long-term either. Within the Structural Decision Framework (SDF), the question is not material — it’s structural threshold: when remaining tooth walls can no longer reliably absorb force.

Quick answer

A large filling becomes risky when remaining tooth structure can no longer distribute biting forces without flexing, cracking, or fatiguing. A crown becomes appropriate when reinforcement improves long-term structural stability.

When a filling is still reasonable (and when reinforcement is safer)

The decision hinges on remaining wall thickness, crack patterns, and force distribution.

Filling still reasonable
When reinforcement is not yet required
Structure remains stable under load.
  • Thick remaining cusps
    Walls are strong enough to resist flexing.
  • No crack lines under load
    No visible propagation patterns.
  • Force distribution is balanced
    No heavy occlusal concentration.
  • Low bruxism risk
    Forces are not repeatedly fatiguing the tooth.
Crown recommended
When reinforcement improves stability
The structure is approaching fatigue threshold.
  • Thin remaining cusps
    Walls flex under bite pressure.
  • Existing crack patterns
    Microfractures risk propagation.
  • Large filling
    Multiple surfaces weaken tooth integrity.
  • High bruxism or load
    Repeated force accelerates fatigue.
5–10 year outlook

Teeth don’t usually fracture randomly. They fatigue.

Think in forces + foundation + follow-through.
Stable filling
Lower risk
Structure remains intact under force over time.
  • Thick enamel support
  • Controlled occlusion
  • No crack progression
Crack progression risk
Moderate risk
Flexing under load gradually weakens the tooth.
  • Cuspal flex under chewing
  • Minor crack propagation
  • Occasional sensitivity
Fracture event
Higher risk
Sudden cusp fracture or split requiring more aggressive treatment.
  • Vertical crack development
  • Loss of tooth wall
  • Possible root canal need
Large filling vs crown

This is less about the material and more about what the tooth can safely tolerate over time.

Keep the filling
Situational
Works well when enough tooth structure remains to resist flexing and fatigue.
Best for
  • Thick remaining cusps and walls
  • No crack lines under load
  • Balanced bite forces with low bruxism risk
Tradeoffs
  • Higher risk of fatigue if the tooth is already thin
  • Small cracks can grow quietly over time
  • A future fracture can escalate the treatment ladder
Watch for
  • New bite sensitivity
  • Chipping or a change in contact/bite
  • Repeated need to re-do the filling
Reinforce with a crown
Often the goal
Adds structural reinforcement when the tooth is approaching a fatigue threshold.
Best for
  • Thin remaining cusps or large compromised walls
  • Crack patterns or repeated symptoms
  • Higher load demand or bruxism risk
Tradeoffs
  • More tooth reduction than a filling
  • More time and cost upfront
  • Still requires bite control and maintenance
Watch for
  • Unmanaged bruxism or heavy lateral load
  • Inflammation around the tooth and margins
  • Delaying too long until a fracture forces a worse outcome
Wait and monitor
Not always right
Sometimes reasonable, but it can be the risky move if the structure is already compromised.
Best for
  • Borderline cases with low force demand
  • Short timing constraints with a clear follow-up plan
  • Monitoring with symptoms guidance and re-check schedule
Tradeoffs
  • Crack progression can be silent
  • The first sign may be a fracture event
  • Options can narrow if you wait too long
Watch for
  • Increasing sensitivity when chewing
  • A tooth feeling ‘different’ under load
  • Any sign the bite is concentrating on that tooth
How SDF evaluates structural thresholds

The threshold is not cosmetic — it’s mechanical.

Structure
Remaining wall thickness and enamel support.
Force
Load concentration and bruxism patterns.
Timing
Early reinforcement prevents crack propagation.
Long-term stability
Preventing fracture avoids escalation to root canal or extraction.