SDF · Applied Scenario

Localized recession: why it happensFix the cause. Then repair.

Localized recession is often treated as a tissue problem. It is usually a stability problem. Something keeps placing pressure on this one site. Within the Structural Decision Framework (SDF), the question is what keeps pushing this one site toward breakdown. If you do not correct the cause, grafting can help but the pattern often returns.

Quick answer

Localized recession usually comes from one or more causes: thin bone support, a tooth sitting outside the envelope, repeated overload, brushing trauma, frenum pull, or inflammation. The best treatment is identifying the cause, correcting it, and then deciding whether tissue augmentation adds long-term value.

Treat the cause vs treat the tissue only

Tissue is the visible part. The cause is the reason it keeps moving.

Driver first
When outcomes become durable
The cause is stabilized before grafting or cosmetic steps.
  • Position is corrected when needed
    A tooth outside the envelope is repositioned into safer bone.
  • Force is reduced or redistributed
    Overload zones are identified and stabilized.
  • Inflammation is controlled
    Gums become stable and predictable.
  • Then tissue is rebuilt
    Augmentation becomes more durable after stability exists.
Tissue only
When recession tends to return
The visible issue is treated while the cause remains.
  • Overload continues
    Force keeps testing the same site.
  • Tooth remains outside the envelope
    Thin bone limits remain unchanged.
  • Brushing pattern remains traumatic
    The same mechanical cause repeats.
  • Repeat procedures become more likely
    The pattern returns over time.
5–10 year outlook

If the cause remains, recession tends to keep moving. If the cause is corrected, outcomes become much quieter.

Think in forces + foundation + follow-through.
Driver stabilized
Lower risk
Position, force, and inflammation are controlled. Tissue stays predictable.
  • Less progression
  • Better graft durability
  • More stable aesthetics
Partial control
Moderate risk
Some causes improve but one remains active.
  • Some drift possible
  • Monitoring matters
  • May need staged intervention
Recurrence pattern
Higher risk
The cause remains and recession continues.
  • Repeat sensitivity
  • More root exposure
  • Higher retreatment likelihood
Common cause patterns

The right plan depends on what is driving the recession in this exact site.

Envelope correction when position is the cause
Often the goal
If the tooth is outside the envelope, repositioning often comes before grafting.
Best for
  • Prominent roots
  • Thin bone housing
  • Progressive localized recession
Tradeoffs
  • Longer sequence
  • Requires follow-through
Watch for
  • Grafting without correcting position and expecting permanence
Force control when overload is the cause
Situational
Reduce repeat overload and then decide if tissue thickening adds value.
Best for
  • Wear patterns
  • Bruxism risk
  • Localized recession with bite imbalance
Tradeoffs
  • Does not remove chewing forces
  • Requires maintenance
Watch for
  • Assuming a night guard alone fixes the whole force system
Graft first for symptoms only
Not always right
It can reduce sensitivity, but stability still depends on the cause.
Best for
  • High sensitivity with stable causes
  • Short-term constraints
Tradeoffs
  • Higher recurrence risk if causes remain
Watch for
  • Recession continuing after grafting
How SDF evaluates localized recession

Recession is a stability decision filtered through four dimensions.

Structure
How thin is the supporting bone and tissue at this site?
Force
Is load repeatedly testing this site or is it balanced?
Timing
Is recession active under current conditions or stable?
Long-term stability
If treated today without correcting the cause, what repeats over years?
If this matches your situation

The next step is simple. We examine structure, force, and timing in person. You do not need to decide everything today.